Clients
Streeter & Nangano provides legal representation to both individuals
and businesses, big and small, as well as through risk
managers and third party administrators. A small sampling
of representative clients have included
Earthlink, Westminster Pontiac, Simpson Buick,
Bristol Farms, Wild Oats, Farmer's and Merchant's
Bank of West Virginia, Heim, Carl Karcher Enterprises,
Zebrasoft Inc., EIC, Inc., Grand Ocean,
Yard House Restaurants, LLC, Carl Warren,
Advanced Development, Inc, and Grocers & Merchants
Insurance Services (GMIS). The insurance
companies that have been serviced by the firm's
attorneys for insurance defense-related representation
in either current or past representations (individually)
run the full breadth of the insurance industry.
Testimonials **
"Bristol Farms chose Streeter & Nangano to handle our defense in class action lawsuits involving claims against manufacturers, distributors, and retailers of consumer products.
We were looking for a defense team that could remain focused on controlling our costs. We needed a team that would respond to our unique needs and time constraints. But most of all, we wanted a law firm that would still be directly representing us if we ultimately ended up in court, a team with real expertise in the courtroom.
We believe we have found all of these in Streeter & Nangano."
--Kevin Davis, President, Chairman & CEO, Bristol Farms, Culver City, CA
"Streeter & Nangano was recently added to a panel of attorneys representing over 30 cities in litigation matters. On their first case you received glowing comments from the excess carrier on their case handling. From the perspectives of the TPA, excess carrier, and the city, Streeter & Nangano is a superior team that is easy to work with, prompt, aggressive, efficient, collaborative, and provides excellent results."
--Roger DeZwarte, Manager, Carl Warren, Glendale Office, Glendale, CA
"Grocers & Merchants Insurance Services (GMIS) can't be more pleased than to have added Streeter & Nangano to its litigation panel.
The firm's handling of significant premises liability matters is not only cost-effective, but with true collaboration, thorough analysis, prompt and constant communication, and superlative outcomes. We are particularly impressed with the firm's approach to litigation and mediation, and the leverage the firm's trial experience brings to moving cases towards early resolution.
There is a marked difference "litigators" and "trial attorneys," and the effect that difference has on the posturing of opposing counsel. I strongly recommend that other insurers, as well as TPAs, and self-insured corporations consider adding the trial attorneys of Streeter & Nangano to their outside litigation panel."
--Lou Goldberg, Esq., Vice President, GMIS, Culver, CA
"As a restaurant chain with a self-insured retention for covered liability claims, the Yard House was looking for a law firm that would be a member of our team, understand our industry and business concerns, and work diligently, pro-actively and aggressively to defend us on general liability matters.
We also wanted a firm with extensive actual trial experience before juries in California because of our belief that jury trial experience brings a more focused litigation approach, and also serves to instill reluctance on the part of plaintiff attorneys, particularly those who bring what we believe are frivolous or fraudulent claims. The Yard House clearly found all that and more in Streeter & Nangano.
We are far more than just satisfied with the great results but also how they aligned their approach with our business concerns. They have gone out of their way to be pro-active, yet to limit costs and provide us with the best possible outcome, and their attorneys always communicate timely on the status of our matters. I can't recommend the law firm of Streeter & Nangano enough as defense counsel for businesses like the Yard House."
--Jeffrey Uttz, CFO & Risk Manager, Yard House Restaurants, LLC, Irvine, CA
**TESTIMONIAL & ENDORSEMENT DISCLAIMER: These testimonials and endorsements do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Results portrayed were dependent on the facts of those specific cases, and the results will differ if based on different facts.
|
